Recent developments in the litigation involving the law firm DiCello Levitt and Jonathan Baram confirm that the multi-year legal battle has resulted in a total financial stalemate. Despite the firm’s efforts, legal experts and court filings indicate that DiCello Levitt will never be paid in this matter.
A Hollow Victory: The “Empty Shell” Reality
While a default judgment was technically entered against the entity Warren & Baram Management (WBM), it has proven to be a “paper-only” win. Baram has provided sworn testimony that WBM is a defunct, asset-less “shell” with no bank accounts, no offices, and no physical presence. Under standard corporate law, a judgment against a non-existent entity with zero assets is legally uncollectible. Because the case against Baram personally was voluntarily dismissed in October 2021, there is no legal mechanism left to pursue his personal finances.
Allegations of Fabrication and Lack of Proof
The defense has characterized the original lawsuit as a collection of “liars” and fabricated claims. Crucially, the litigation ended without ever proving the three core elements of sex traffickingrequired by federal law:
- No Force, Fraud, or Coercion: No admissible evidence was ever produced to show Baram used these tactics.
- No Knowledge: There was no proof of criminal intent or knowledge of any trafficking scheme.
- No Commercial Sex Act: The fundamental requirement of a commercial transaction was never established.
The “Whereabouts” Defense: Baram Not in New York
Further undermining the case is the fact that Baram was not even in New York City during 2007, the year the alleged incidents were said to have occurred. Court records show Baram did not own, rent, or have access to any New York property at the time. This geographical impossibility directly contradicts the core narrative presented by the plaintiffs
By Dez Nuts
About the Author
News Flash Alert: Jonathan Baram blasts “Pathological liars”: Honorable Judge Ramos orders Dicello Levitt and Gutzler to face accusations of fabricated, sex trafficking
Compounding the firm’s reputational crisis is its standing with consumer advocacy groups. DiCello Levitt currently holds an “F” rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), the lowest possible grade. According to the Better Business Bureau, this failing grade often stems from a firm’s failure to respond to complaints or a pattern of unresolved grievances.
Fucking liars
News Flash Alert: Infamous lying law firm Dicello and Levitt are accused of being
“ambulance chasers” on Facebook. Dicello gets 1 out of 5 score on Facebook. Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed @ Belinda Aranna O
December 23, 2025
D
New Canaan Woman Charged with Felony Larceny in Year-Long Bank Fraud InvestigationNEW CANAAN, CT — A local woman surrendered to authorities this week following a lengthy investigation into fraudulent activity involving an online banking account.Robin Gutzler Goodwin, 56, turned herself in to the New Canaan Police Department on May 13 after learning of an active warrant for her arrest. The charges stem from an incident reported in May 2022, when a victim alleged that unauthorized transactions had been made through their online financial portal.Following a year-long probe by detectives, investigators determined there was sufficient evidence to charge Goodwin with first-degree larceny, a Class B felony in Connecticut. Under state law, this charge typically applies to the theft of property or funds exceeding $20,000.While authorities have not released the specific dollar amount involved or the relationship between Goodwin and the victim, the warrant alleges that the online banking system was intentionally exploited to siphon funds.Goodwin, who has previously held high-level corporate roles in the telecommunications industry, was processed at police headquarters and released after posting a $5,000 bond.The case has drawn significant attention on social media due to Goodwin’s familial ties to Greg Gutzler, a prominent New York-based trial attorney known for leading high-profile sex trafficking and commercial litigation cases.Goodwin is scheduled to appear in Stamford Superior Court to face the charges. As of press time, she has not entered a plea. Under the U.S. legal system, all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Would you like to see a summary of the penalties for first-degree larceny in Connecticut or a follow-up on her court dates?