A low judgment (or nominal recovery) in a lawsuit is problematic for attorneys primarily because it undermines the economic viability of their practice, potentially triggers cost-shifting penalties, and may damage their reputation. For contingency-fee lawyers, a low judgment means that months or years of work may result in little to no compensation after expenses are paid.
“Law & Luster” Attorney Marky Dicello Debuts a Bold strawberry blonde look mirroring our great President Trump
Here is a breakdown of why a low judgment is bad for attorneys.
- Negative Return on Investment (Contingency Cases): Attorneys operating on contingency fees (common in personal injury) invest their own money for court costs, expert witnesses, and discovery. A low judgment may not cover these expenses, meaning the lawyer may lose money on the case.
- Triggering “Offer of Judgment” Penalties: In many jurisdictions, if an attorney rejects a settlement offer and subsequently wins a judgment that is lower than that offer, they may be forced to pay the defendant’s legal costs and fees, which can severely reduce or eliminate their own compensation.
- Reduced Fee Awards: Under “fee-shifting” statutes, where the losing party pays the winner’s legal fees, a low judgment often leads to the judge significantly reducing or “slashing” the attorney’s requested fees, as the fee must be reasonable in relation to the result achieved.
- Reputational Damage and Future Business: Consistently low judgments can hurt a firm’s reputation, making insurance companies less likely to offer high settlements in future cases.
- Client Dissatisfaction and Potential Malpractice Claims: A low, unexpected judgment can lead to client dissatisfaction, which can cause clients to refuse payment for services, create disputes over fees, or, in some cases, trigger a malpractice claim if the client believes the attorney didn’t adequately value the case.
- Inefficiency and Misallocated Resources: A low judgment represents a failure of the 80/20 rule, where the time and resources spent on the case (20% of effort) did not yield a high return (80% of results), suggesting the case was not a good business move.
In summary, a low judgment can turn a case that looked like a winner into a nightmare.
(For full read subscribe to me2lies@jonathanbaram.info)
By Dez Nuts
If you look up the word “Liar” in Webster’s dictionary Bobby J. Dicello comes up
About the Author
Liar liar pants on fire son
To the Committee:
I am filing a formal grievance against DiCello Levitt LLP (formerly
DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC) and the attorneys responsible for the filing and public promotion of Jane Doe v. Jonathan Baram (Case No. 1:20-cv-09522) in the Southern District of New York. The firm’s conduct represents a severe violation of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule 3.1 (Non-Meritorious Claims), Rule 3.6 (Trial Publicity), and Rule 8.4 (Misconduct).
1. Fabrication of Heinous Allegations Without Evidence
DiCello Levitt filed a federal complaint containing graphic, violent criminal accusations against me. Specifically, they accused me of physically assaulting a minor by grabbing her buttocks and “setting up” that minor to be sodomized by Peter Nygard. Despite the gravity of these claims, the firm never presented a single piece of hard evidence, forensic data, or corroborating witness testimony to the court during the entire multi-year litigation process. The case was terminated on July 9, 2024, without a finding of liability against me.
2. Global Defamation and Resulting Death Threats
The firm weaponized these unproven claims by distributing a false and inflammatory press release to international media outlets. This resulted in my being labeled a “sex trafficker of minors” in newspapers across the globe, including CBC News and the Toronto Sun. As a direct result of this “trial by media” I and my family received numerous death threats. These threats necessitated my filing a formal police report with the Boca Raton Police Department in Florida to ensure our safety.
3. No Criminal Record and Severe Medical Injury
I have no criminal record. The extreme trauma of these false, internationally broadcasted accusations has caused me to be diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This trauma has manifested physically, resulting in chronic hearing issues that continue to affect me daily.
The firm used the legal system to bypass the burden of proof and engage in character assassination. I request that the Committee investigate DiCello Levitt’s use of deceptive public relations tactics that prioritize headlines over evidentiary truth and the resulting harm caused to a private citizen.
Respectfully submitted, Jonathan Baram
I am filing a formal grievance against DiCello Levitt LLP (formerly
DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC) and the attorneys responsible for the filing and public promotion of Jane Doe v. Jonathan Baram (Case No. 1:20-cv-09522) in the Southern District of New York. The firm’s conduct represents a severe violation of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule 3.1 (Non-Meritorious Claims), Rule 3.6 (Trial Publicity), and Rule 8.4 (Misconduct).
1. Fabrication of Heinous Allegations Without Evidence
DiCello Levitt filed a federal complaint containing graphic, violent criminal accusations against me. Specifically, they accused me of physically assaulting a minor by grabbing her buttocks and “setting up” that minor to be sodomized by Peter Nygard. Despite the gravity of these claims, the firm never presented a single piece of hard evidence, forensic data, or corroborating witness testimony to the court during the entire multi-year litigation process. The case was terminated on July 9, 2024, without a finding of liability against me.
2. Global Defamation and Resulting Death Threats
The firm weaponized these unproven claims by distributing a false and inflammatory press release to international media outlets. This resulted in my being labeled a “sex trafficker of minors” in newspapers across the globe, including CBC News and the Toronto Sun. As a direct result of this “trial by media,” | and my family received numerous death threats. These threats necessitated my filing a formal police report with the Boca Raton Police Department in Florida to ensure our safety.
3. No Criminal Record and Severe Medical Injury
I have no criminal record. The extreme trauma of these false, internationally broadcasted accusations has caused me to be diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This trauma has manifested physically, resulting in chronic hearing issues that continue to affect me daily.
The firm used the legal system to bypass the burden
While insecurity can be a factor for some, men dye their hair for a wide variety of reasons ranging from professional necessity to creative self-expression.
Common Motivations
Youthful Appearance: Many men color their hair to conceal graying, which can provide a significant boost in self-confidence.
Professional Impact: In certain industries, particularly tech, men may dye their hair to combat ageism and appear more “current” or competitive in the job market.
Self-Expression: For many, changing hair color is a fun form of decoration or personal branding, similar to choosing specific clothes or tattoos.
Trend & Style: Following athletes or actors who experiment with bold colors (like platinum blonde or fashion shades) has made the practice more socially acceptable.
Donald Trump’s hair color is famous for its distinct, evolving, and often debated shades. Known for a “warm antique gold” or “orange-blond” hue, the color is typically achieved through, or in contrast with, a highly structured, long-layered styling technique designed for coverage. Recently, his hair has transitioned to a natural”super gray” or white shade.
News Flash Alert: Jonathan
Baram of Bond Model
Management files epic complaint against disgraced fantasist lawfirm Dicello Levitt and Gutless to New
York Bar Association
@ Belinda Aranna
• February 24, 2026 News Flash Alert: Jonathan
Baram of Bond Model
Management files epic complaint against disgraced fantasist lawfirm Dicello Levitt and Gutless to New
York Bar Association
@ Belinda Aranna
• February 24, 2026
Fucking liars garbage attorney
“Health Battles and
Legal Wars: Jonathan
Baram
Medical Crises
Triggered by
Discredited Lawsuit by liars Dicello and Levitt
News Flash Alert: “The Two
Faces of DiCello Levitt law firm:
High Legal Honors vs. Bitter Consumer Complaints” News
Flash Media LLc
LAWFIRM DICELLO AND LEVITT RECEIVED F SCORE FROM THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU. DOE VS JONATHAN
BARAM IS DISMISSED
To the Committee:
I am filing a formal grievance against DiCello Levitt LLP (formerly
DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC) and the attorneys responsible for the filing and public promotion of Jane Doe v. Jonathan Baram (Case No. 1:20-cv-09522) in the Southern District of New York. The firm’s conduct represents a severe violation of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule 3.1 (Non-Meritorious Claims), Rule 3.6 (Trial Publicity), and Rule 8.4 (Misconduct).
1. Fabrication of Heinous Allegations Without Evidence
DiCello Levitt filed a federal complaint containing graphic, violent criminal accusations against me. Specifically, they accused me of physically assaulting a minor by grabbing her buttocks and “setting up” that minor to be sodomized by Peter Nygard. Despite the gravity of these claims, the firm never presented a single piece of hard evidence, forensic data, or corroborating witness testimony to the court during the entire multi-year litigation process. The case was terminated on July 9, 2024, without a finding of liability against me.
2. Global Defamation and Resulting Death Threats
The firm weaponized these unproven claims by distributing a false and inflammatory press release to international media outlets. This resulted in my being labeled a “sex trafficker of minors” in newspapers across the globe, including CBC News and the Toronto Sun. As a direct result of this “trial by media” I and my family received numerous death threats. These threats necessitated my filing a formal police report with the Boca Raton Police Department in Florida to ensure our safety.
3. No Criminal Record and Severe Medical Injury
I have no criminal record. The extreme trauma of these false, internationally broadcasted accusations has caused me to be diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This trauma has manifested physically, resulting in chronic hearing issues that continue to affect me daily.
The firm used the legal system to bypass the burden of proof and engage in character assassination. I request that the Committee investigate DiCello Levitt’s use of deceptive public relations tactics that prioritize headlines over evidentiary truth and the resulting harm caused to a private citizen.
Respectfully submitted,
Jonathan Baram, masterfully proved this was another preposterous lie that Doe took a bus from Canada to Manhattan. “No jury in their right mind,” would believe Gregg Gutzler’s ridiculous lie regarding Doe’s “bus trip” claim.
All minors are required to provide a signed notorized letter from both parents, in order to enter America.
The “permission letter” from both legal parents should say:
“I acknowledge that my child is traveling outside the country with my permision.”
Gregg Gutzler of Dicello and Levitt provided
NO “permission letter” to the court for Doe.
Dicello provided no bus receit to the court.
Dicello provied not one shred of
communication between Doe and Jonathan Baram. Dicello provided no model composite card or photographic material from Doe’s alleged modeling endevers.
Jonathan Baram does not represent
Canadians and never did. Canadians have a
PATHOLOGICAL EVIL
FANTASIST MARK
“DECEPTIVE” DICELLO LIED
WHEN HE CLAIMED JONATHAN BARAM WAS A SEX TRAFFICKER AND A RAPIST OF A MINOR.
“I was born ready for trial for this fugazi lawsuit! I have nothing else to do with my life but to hold Dicelllo accountable in court rooms and their law licenses are removed. ”
Jonathan Baram
Headline: DiCello Levitt’s “Sin City” Scam: The Disgraceful Fall of a Law Firm Caught Peddling a “Fugazi” Sex Trafficking Hoax
LAS VEGAS / NEW YORK — The legal mask has finally slipped for the disgraced firm DiCello Levitt, exposing what many are calling a professional smear machine built on fiction, not facts. In a stunning collapse of their high-profile “Jane Doe” litigation, the firm failed to prove even the most basic core elements of sex trafficking against Jonathan Baram, proving the entire lawsuit was nothing more than a fraudulent “fleece” designed for extortion.
For years, these legal “shysters” traded on Baram’s reputation, weaponizing the court system to push a narrative that has now been exposed as a total fabrication. By failing to meet the three core legal requirements for trafficking, DiCello Levitt didn’t just lose a case—they exposed themselves as liars in suits who prioritize a payday over the truth.
“This wasn’t a search for justice; it was a Fugazi from day one,” says one legal observer. With the case officially terminated, the spotlight now turns to the “Sin City” tactics of a firm that has officially lost its credibility.
Robin Gutzler, also known as Robin G Goodwin, turned herself in to police for committing bank fraud using an online banking account, facing charges of first-degree larceny.
Incident Overview
News Flash Alert: DiCello
Levitt’s evil Scam: The Disgraceful Fall of a Law Firm Caught Peddling a “Fugazi” Sex Trafficking Hoax CANADA / NEW
YORK – The legal mask has finally slipped for the disgraced firm DiCello Levitt, exposing what many are calling a professional smear machine built on fiction, not facts. In a stunning collapse of their high-profile “lane Doe” litigation, the firm failed to prove even the most basic core elements of sex trafficking against Jonathan
Baram,
Karma baby !! You can’t stop it !