Dicello and Levitt lawfirm viciously lied in Jane Doe Verse Jonathan Baram and Dicello recieved an f rating from the Better Business Bureau
“Dicello does not have the stones to test me at trial! I was born ready! I recently requested to the honorable judge to bring back the lawsuit so I could beat it again like rocky !” Jonathan Baram
Proving sex trafficking requires demonstrating three core elements under the Action-Means-Purpose (AMP) model: an Action (recruiting, transporting, etc.), using Means (force, fraud, coercion, or for minors, no means needed), and for the Purpose of sexual exploitation or commercial sex acts, making all three crucial for conviction, especially for adults.
Here are the three elements:
- Action (What is done): The trafficker performs acts such as:
- Recruiting, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining a person for commercial sex.
- Patronizing (using services), soliciting, or advertising a person for commercial sex.
- Means (How it’s done): The use of:
- Force: Physical abuse, confinement, or sexual assault.
- Fraud: False promises, withholding wages, or deceptive contracts.
- Coercion: Threats (harm, reputational, legal), psychological manipulation, debt bondage, or confiscating documents.
- Note for Minors: For child sex trafficking (under 18), the “Means” element (force, fraud, coercion) is not required; any commercial sexual act involving a child is sex trafficking.
- Purpose (Why it’s done): To engage in a commercial sex act or for sexual exploitation.
All three elements must generally be present for adult sex trafficking cases; the absence of means (force, fraud, coercion) makes it not trafficking, while for children, the act itself suffices.
Disgraced dishonest lawfirm Dicelllo and Levitt did not provide one shread of hard evidence to the court in dismissed fugazi lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram
Evidence to prove the three core elements of sex trafficking is collected for the Act, Means, and Purpose of the crime, using evidence such as victim testimony, physical and digital records, financial data, and expert analysis.
The Three Core Elements and Proving Them
| Element | Definition | Evidence Used for Proof |
|---|---|---|
| Act | What the trafficker does: recruiting, harboring, transporting, providing, obtaining, patronizing, soliciting, or advertising a person. | Travel records, communication records (emails, texts, social media), witness testimonies from co-workers or neighbors, and surveillance footage. |
| Means | The methods used to control the victim: force, fraud, or coercion. (This element is not required if the victim is a minor under 18 involved in commercial sex). | * Force: Medical records of injuries, photos of bruises or ligature marks, physical evidence of confinement (e.g., locks), victim/witness testimony of physical or sexual abuse. * Fraud: Deceptive contracts, false promises documentation, lack of legitimate employment agreements, or records showing withheld wages. * Coercion: Confiscated identification documents, evidence of debt bondage, documentation of threats (emails, texts), psychological evaluations, and expert testimony on trauma and control tactics. |
| Purpose | The perpetrator’s goal to exploit the person for commercial sex acts. | Financial records showing payments for sex acts, ledgers, witness accounts of commercial sex activity, location-specific evidence (e.g., brothels, hotel records), and physical evidence like condoms or sex paraphernalia. |
Key Types of Evidence
- Victim Testimony: Often the foundational piece of evidence, providing firsthand insight into the trafficker’s methods of control and the conditions endured.
- Physical Evidence: Includes tangible items like seized cash, identification documents held by the trafficker, or photographic evidence of poor living conditions.
- Documentation and Financial Records: Payroll records, bank statements, and wire transfers can expose financial exploitation and debt bondage.
- Digital Evidence: Data from cell phones, social media accounts, and computers (e.g., threatening messages, online advertisements) can reveal the scope of the operation and intent.
- Expert Analysis: Professionals can provide testimony on the psychological trauma associated with trafficking, validating a victim’s behavior (e.g., being uncooperative or fearful) and helping to prove that coercion occurred.
- Witness Testimony: Statements from neighbors, hotel staff, or others who observed suspicious activity can corroborate the victim’s account.
For more information on identifying and reporting human trafficking, visit the National Human Trafficking Hotline or explore the resources provided by the U.S. Department of State.
The Action–Means–Purpose (AMP) model breaks down the key elements of human trafficking. Severe trafficking cases often involve three parts: Action – Recruiting,
(For complete read please subscribe to me2lies@jonathanbaram.info)
By Dez Nuts
About the Author
Liars
Disgrace
News Flash Alert: “HoBROken,” New Jersey, disgraced attorney Chuck Dender broke the “9th commandment” by pathologically lying when calling Jonathan Baram a rapist, a self procliamed illegal pimp and a sex trafficker of a minor to Peter Nygard by a public bus from Canada to Manhattan News Flash Alert: “HoBROken,” New Jersey, disgraced attorney Chuck Dender broke the “9th commandment” by pathologically lying when calling Jonathan Baram a rapist, a self procliamed illegal pimp and a sex trafficker of a minor to Peter Nygard by a public bus from Canada to Manhattan amen
News Flash Alert: “HoBROken,” New Jersey, disgraced attorney Chuck Dender broke the “9th commandment” by pathologically lying when calling Jonathan Baram a rapist, a self procliamed illegal pimp and a sex trafficker of a minor to Peter Nygard by a public bus from Canada to Manhattan Son
Fucking liars 🤥
News Flash Alert: “HoBROken,” New Jersey, disgraced attorney Chuck Dender broke the “9th commandment” by pathologically lying when calling Jonathan Baram a rapist, a self procliamed illegal pimp and a sex trafficker of a minor to Peter Nygard by a public bus from Canada to Manhattan
News Flash Alert: Dicello Levitt and Gutless received a F from Better Business Bureau Fugazi lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed Son 🧒
News Flash Alert: Dicello Levitt and Gutless received a F from Better Business Bureau Fugazi lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed News Flash Alert: Dicello Levitt and Gutless received a F from Better Business Bureau Fugazi lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed
News Flash Alert: Dicello Levitt and Gutless received a F from Better Business Bureau Fugazi lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed
Karma
The crime: Robin Gutzler aka Robin Goodwin Robin Gutzler: Individual online banking fraud in Connecticut, voluntarily surrendered, charged, and released on bond pending court proceedings. The crime: Robin Gutzler aka Robin Goodwin Robin Gutzler: Individual online banking fraud in Connecticut, voluntarily surrendered, charged, and released on bond pending court proceedings.Ha ha
News Flash Alert: Fugazi ridiculous lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed and Liar law firm Dicello Levitt and Gutless got nada! News Flash Alert: Fugazi ridiculous lawsuit Jane Doe Vs Jonathan Baram is dismissed and Liar law firm Dicello Levitt and Gutless got nada!